This does not mean confusables.txt is wrong. It means confusables.txt is a visual-similarity claim that has never been empirically validated at scale. Many entries map characters to the same abstract target under NFKC decomposition (mathematical bold A to A, for instance), and the mapping is semantically correct even if the glyphs look nothing alike. But if you treat every confusables.txt entry as equally dangerous for UI security, you are generating massive false positive rates for 96.5% of the dataset.
Самое грязное место в самолете и скандальные пассажиры:как живут стюардессы и какими секретами они делятся в сети?5 сентября 2022，更多细节参见51吃瓜
Get editor selected deals texted right to your phone!，详情可参考WPS官方版本下载
这个句式结构，最初源于时尚穿搭博主。某博主在介绍服装时，常说“上身基础，下身就不基础”。后来这种说法被一些网友模仿，“XX基础，XX不基础”就变成了一个百搭句式，比如在评论一个家长不小心把孩子摔了而孩子幸好毫发无损的新闻时，就会开玩笑说：“家长基础，孩子就不基础。”